| Author |
Message |
Astenz
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:11 pm Post subject: Same here... |
 |
|
| hakan wrote: | Any news about 2009 and long path names?
It is a big problem for me! |
I agree with you guys, the 256cars limitation is a big issue here... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TGRMN Software
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 8684
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hakan
Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
My first test worked just fine. Thanks!!
_________________
Håkan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnDB
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:53 am Post subject: 2.009 installation |
|
|
Good news this version is now available. However - when it is installed, should it wipe out the registration details, requiring them to be re-added.
Also, and more importantly, installing taking the defaults appears to remover the scheduled jobs. Is this as expected?
Thanks
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnDB
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:57 am Post subject: Apologies re last post |
|
|
Oops - my mistake on the scheduler. The schedule details are in fact retained (don't ask). However, the question regarding registration information still stands.
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 8684
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi - if you do not uninstall version 2.0.0.8 before installing version 2.0.0.9 the registration info is retained.
_________________
--
TGRMN Software Support
http://www.tgrmn.com
http://www.compareandmerge.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
guest
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:52 am Post subject: Long filenames syncs still have issues ... |
|
|
Hi guys,
Firstly, congratulations on what is the most near-perfect software in this category. I am an IT consultant, and have been searching for ages for a tool that will do correct bi-directional synchronisation of files and folders to external USB drives, and also handle the long file-name issue.
In Windows, it is possible to rename a parent folder (when re-classifying documentation for example) to a longer name which can sometimes cause its children to become un-readable through explorer as the path is now too long. The data is still present though, and renaming the parent folder back to a shorter name allows you to recover this data.
When setting up backup solutions for clients, I like to know that ALL data (even if the path is too long is being backed up)
I tested VV 1 ages ago, and found it could not handle long paths. I have been using other sync software for that reason alone. However I do like many of VV's features, especially the new Shadow copy feature in VV2
I have since retested with the trial version of VV2 (2.0.0.9), and have found that whilst using the '\\?\' prefix allows long paths to be backed up, it still does not imo function correctly when performing a mirror or sync operation.
ie if I backup '\\?\C:\source\a-very-long-pathname (>256 characters)' to '\\?\C:\dest\a-very-long-pathname (>256 characters)' it works fine.
However, if a folder in '\\?\C:\source\a-very-long-pathname (>256 characters)' is renamed, and a sync is re-run with the 'Mirror source to dest' option, the
'\\?\C:\dest\a-very-long-pathname (>256 characters)' copy cannot be deleted by the sync engine, resulting in two copies in the dest folder, the original and the renamed copy. This obviously invalidates the integrity of the mirrored or synchronised information ....
This is a key feature for me, and so far I've only found two other bits of software which do this correctly whilst also providing an accurate bi-di sync, but they do not have the 'usability' factor I have got from the VV trials.
Sorry about the long post, but any chance this could be resolved? I would dearly like to be able to reap the benefits of the advanced features of VV2, however cannot warrant doing so unless the long paths issue is fully resolved. So far I have only tested this issue with a mirror backup, but where I actually require this to work the most is with bi-di syncing.
Many thanks
CC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 8684
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fred
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the Target path does not work if more than 256 char.
Is this the correct format?
\\?\myserver\folder |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 8684
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rfv
Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:05 am Post subject: path length 259 max - when it will be solved ? |
|
|
I am using
ViceVersa Pro 2 - Build 2010
An di still have this problem of longpath more than 259 - it says... and stops. It is indeed a problem. Is there a way to go around - and/or when a build will solve this problem. ?
Thanx
Robert |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 8684
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dan
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I'm running build 2014 and copying long file names works fine in the ViceVersa GUI using \\?\E: or \\?\UNC\server\share
However, if I save my profile and try to run it in VVEngine 1.1, I get the message: Folder is not accessible: \\E:\
Any clues as to how to fix this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 8684
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unfortunately VVengine does not handle \\?\ yet when monitoring folders in the profile schedule. It will be supported in the next release.
_________________
--
TGRMN Software Support
http://www.tgrmn.com
http://www.compareandmerge.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
danlegau
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When will the new version be available?
In the meantime, what are my options? The profile with \\?\ won't even run in VVLauncher.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
ViceVersa HOME 
Forum FAQ
Search Forum
Register
Profile
Log in
